"California’s case against
CISCO Systems is unconstitutional, violates Hindus’ religious freedom,"
Says the "Hindu American Foundation"
https://www.hinduamerican.org/press/california-cisco-case-violates-religious-freedom
BUT THAT APPEAL CAN BE QUASHED
because the Indian government and
the Supreme court of India has categorically stated that they will not accept
there is such a thing as "Hindu religion".
WATCH THE VIDEO in which Mr. Modi
vehemently opposes the term "Hindu religion"
(How old is the
Hindu Religion?)
DO THEY (HAF) HAVE A CASE?
My opinion..
Our guys should go straight for
the kill, using the term ex-UNTOUCHABLES today legally known as SCs and avoid the term Hindu-Dalit
Since Hindu is not a religion,
SCs are not Hindus. This was also proved by Dr Ambedkar at the 2nd RTC. To
prove SCs are not Hindus was crucial, in order to legally secure the right for
seperate electorate. This he did and if Mr Gandhi had not emotionally blackmailed
Dr Ambedkar to sign the Poona pact, NO SC OF TODAY WOULD BE KNOWN AS HINDU
So which religious freedom is
being violated according to HAF?
(The freedom to discriminate
based on birth?)
=================
ALSO READ:
WHY ARE THE FOUR
VARNA DHARMIS 'ON EDGE OF THEIR SEATS' IN UK?
No comments:
Post a Comment