This is the original preamble to the Constitution of India.
Can adding ONE word/phrase; i.e. secular (or secularism) to the constitution make you
far more intelligent and educated than the polymath, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar (BA; MA; MSc; Phd; DSc;
LLD; DLitt; Bar-at-Law), an eminent scholar of Jurisprudence, the chief
architect of the Indian Constitution and a lexicographer ?
The answer is an obvious NO.
Some counter questions:
- Why was the need felt to add the word “secular” after decades of the Indian Constitution being in force?
- Wasn't the original preamble as perfect as you can practically get?
The
wording in the following image is wrongly accepted as the preamble to the
constitution and it is in fact A LIE that it is the preamble. The “new”
preamble cannot be the preamble because it suggests a preamble
to a constitution that was accepted in 1949 and adopted in 1950.
A new preamble can only be a preamble to a new constitution.
Take special note of the LAST LINE IN GREEN LETTERS in the ASSUMED
PREAMBLE (below).
The reality is that the ORIGINAL preamble cannot be
amended/edited/ words added to or removed. It can only be replaced.
So Indira Gandhi attempted to REPLACE
the original preamble with the one that suited her needs and succeeded in
fooling the majority that it is a required AMENDMENT (not a replacement).
PS. : Shockingly even the latest
versions of Indian Constitution states that ‘… (on) the 26th day of November
1949 we hereby adopt , enact and give to ourselves This constitution…’ whereas,
it includes the terms ‘Socialist and Secular ‘ that were added in 1976 i.e. 27
years later. This is a gross misuse of political power and
therefore intellectual dishonesty by Indira Gandhi.
Author: Shekhar Bodhakar
Also Read:
Can we remove
secular and socialist words from the Indian Constitution?
No comments:
Post a Comment